Talk:Ripsaw

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Woodworking, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.WoodworkingWikipedia:WikiProject WoodworkingTemplate:WikiProject WoodworkingWoodworking articles

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Is is not rather superfluous to have this article (stub) as well as the one titled rip cut? I think they could be usefully combined into one article.

Also, the image of a rip saw shown here is so similar to the one shown at crosscut saw, it's impossible to see any meaningful difference. It would be nicer to see e.g. a black & white diagram of the teeth demonstrating the differences between the two... Maybe even the same diagram on both pages, to save resources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ozaru (talk • contribs) 19:09, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics[edit]

I added the section on technical information (TPI, weight, length, etc). However, I've had no success in finding out the weight, length, and other such things. Can anyone help with this? - Two-Sixteen.11.222.21 18:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 February 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 16:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rip saw → Ripsaw – Per WP:COMMONNAME. Webster's Dictionary, Dictionary.com, and thefreedictionary.com all list it as "ripsaw" and Britannica also titles their article as "ripsaw". Additionally, the Google Ngrams stow that "ripsaw" is the more common spelling. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:31, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom as the more commonly used name. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 01:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.