Talk:Ripley's Aquarium of Canada

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ripley's Aquarium of Canada article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Mid-importance).

Zoo

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoo, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to zoos, aquaria, and aviaries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZooWikipedia:WikiProject ZooTemplate:WikiProject ZooZoo articles

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Purchasing policy[edit]

On their website, they say that they have a "Comprehensive Environmental Purchasing Policy", but there isn't any information about what that means. Is there any public information about how all these animals were acquired, or whether the aquarium is involved in any specific efforts to protect them in the wild?

--Ilnyckyj (talk) 15:15, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article Organization Evaluation[edit]

The major section on the exhibits of the attraction is very well organized. It has a concise lead as well as a bullet-ed list with more detail. The other major sections do not have as a clear structure as well as seem to be lacking thorough information. The article overall seems to be missing information that can further strengthen the article.

RafiKhandaker (talk) 10:11, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]