Talk:Rineen ambush

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rineen ambush article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Irish Republicanism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Irish Republicanism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Irish republicanism and Irish nationalism related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Irish RepublicanismWikipedia:WikiProject Irish RepublicanismTemplate:WikiProject Irish RepublicanismIrish Republicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled[edit]

Superfopp, your constant re-writing of pages purely for the sake of it is just creating unnecessary work. However, here's why I'm making the following changes,

1, The start of the War of Independence is a matter of considerable debate and there is no need for this article to go into it.
2, The RIC didn't "flee" their rural barracks, they abandoned or evacuated the smaller ones in rural areas (2-3 policemen) as a matter of policy.
3, 'ambush' does not take a capital letter
4, What is the difference between "killed instantly" and "killed outright"? Or "shot dead" and "shot and killed"? What was the point of making these changes?
5, There is no need for IRA men to be called "volunteers" at every mention. This is not done in the sources.
6, This was not a 'battle', which is a very large enegament, so "action" is more appropriate.
7, "Shortly after" is not the same as "immediately afterwards - ie right after.
8, This "A separate RIC raid in Ennistymon, in which several homes and businesses were burned. In this raid they killed Tom Connole, the secretary of the local ITGWU trade union, and burned his home. PJ Linnane, a 15-year-old boy, was also shot dead by the police", makes no sense grammatically and has to be reverted.

I really have to ask why you do these re-wordings constantly? I'm not trying to be rude here, but going to into an article and changing the wording without explanation (or apparent point) is not often helpful. Jdorney (talk) 21:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the edits are/were merely fixing grammar or making sentences more straightforward and easier to read — that goes for points 3, 4 and 8. That was also my reason for the changes in points 2 and 7, but you've since shown that those two weren't needed.
Also, I wasn't aware there was any debate over "when the War began". The main article and numerous sources say that it began in January 1919...? ~Asarlaí 21:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ifyou want to see a sample of the debate on the war's start, you should read the talk page of the main article. Re the grammar is was not wrong to begin with, nor was it difficult to read. So why the constant minor changes? Jdorney (talk) 22:07, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dead of Alan Lendrum[edit]

Please read source 8 ([1]) about the circumstances of his death. The source states: The car was taken a mile further on and the wounded man was taken to an outhouse in a field nearby where he died that evening. In the meantime the car was secreted eight miles further on. The body was weighed down and sunk off low-water the same night. Pádraig Óg Ó Ruairc, the write of that article also states: Even though the British Military inquest had established that Lendrum had died of gunshot wounds members of the R.I.C. in Clare spread an alternative version of events and claimed that Lendrum had died of drowning. According to Fr. Pat Gaynor a priest in the area; “After a subsequent autopsy, the police claimed that he had been buried while still alive: that death was due to drowning.”6 (In my book “Blood On the Banner. The Republican Struggle in Clare. Mercier Press. Cork 2009 I mistakenly attributed the ultimate cause of Lendrums death to drowning when the I.R.A. disposed of his body instead of his gunshot wounds. This Factual error will be corrected in any further editions of the work.)

So claiming that Lendrum died from drowning is incorrect. The Banner talk 08:32, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]