Talk:Righteous indignation

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

restored deleted paragraphs[edit]

Deleted by anon in 2014.[1]

The Forerunner Commentary on Psalms 137:2 argues that these psalms are about the "bitterness of exile into which God forced Judah", purportedly with the goal of turning grief into zeal, so that the "anger can be used to scour away sin" by becoming "righteously indignant".^[1] In Richard T. Ritenbaugh's comments on Proverbs 15:18 in How to Survive Exile, he argues that it "is alright for us to be righteously indignant as long as we do not sin."^[1] In McCosh's book Motive Powers, he notes that "We may be angry and sin not; but this disposition may become sinful, and this in the highest degree. It is so when it is excessive, when it is rage, and makes us lose control of ourselves. It is so, and may become a vice, when it leads us to wish evil to those who have offended us. It is resentment when it prompts us to meet and repay evil by evil. It is vengeance when it impels us to crush those who have injured us. It is vindictiveness when it is seeking out ingeniously and laboriously means and instruments to give pain to those who have thwarted us. Already sin has entered."^[2]

Deleted by editor in 13 September 2012.[2]

St. Thomas Aquinas, in the question on anger of his Summa Theologiae, quotes the Opus Imperfectum in Matthaeum, "he that is angry without cause, shall be in danger; but he that is angry with cause, shall not be in danger: for without anger, teaching will be useless, judgments unstable, crimes unchecked," and concludes saying that "to be angry is therefore not always an evil."^[3]

references

^ ^a ^b "Righteous Indignation (Forerunner Commentary) :: Bible Tools". webcache.googleusercontent.com. 2010-02-19. Retrieved 2010-03-19.
^ Cite error: The named reference humanele was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ ST, II-II, Q. 158, a. 1, sed contra.

93.80.229.75 (talk) 07:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing about the ship name?[edit]

I am a little surprised that there is no mention of the ship's name from "Bucky O'Hare". Not notable enough? Merleblue (talk) 17:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Righteous indignation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://bibletools.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Topical.show/RTD/cgg/ID/729/Righteous-Indignation.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Old Testament Bible commentary[edit]

"Old Tesstament commentary" starting with Paul's letter to the Ephesians? Clearly out of place. The other references for "Old Testament commentary, the Forerunner Commentary and James McCosh are obscure and outside the mainstream of contemporary scholarship. A.T.S. in Texas (talk) 00:21, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect with resentment[edit]

To me, this really just sounds like a section on resentment. Hopefully, someone could make a redirect to resentment, and include all this info as a subsection (I have no idea how to do this, currently; and I would want consensus, if I was going to do this). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Robot 2020 (talk • contribs) 10:16, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[forerunner-1] "Righteous Indignation (Forerunner Commentary) :: Bible Tools". webcache.googleusercontent.com. 2010-02-19. Retrieved 2010-03-19.

[humanele-2] Cite error: The named reference humanele was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[3] ST, II-II, Q. 158, a. 1, sed contra.

[1]

[2]

[3]

restored deleted paragraphs[edit]

further reading[edit]

Nothing about the ship name?[edit]

External links modified[edit]

Old Testament Bible commentary[edit]

Redirect with resentment[edit]