Talk:Richard Nixon/GA3

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Excellent article! I made some minor wording and punc changes, but I see no major problems. I read the entire article and found it to be very well written and informative without omissions or errors. There are plenty of sources.

1. Well-written

Yes

2. Factually accurate and verifiable

Excellent amount of references

3. Broad in its coverage

No ommissions, about entire life

4. Neutral

Yes

5. Stable

Yes

6. Illustrated

Yes.

I would love to pass this article, but I am a novice in the GA reviewing field, so I'll ask for another opinion. Thanks for your work on the article so far! Reywas92 ^Talk 22:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! Hopefully it will be completed soon. Thanks a lot! Best, Happyme22 (talk) 22:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to go ahead and pass this article to become a GA. This is a very good article and I hope that you will take it to WP:PR and WP:FLC. Reywas92 ^Talk 02:53, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Best, Happyme22 (talk) 19:21, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]