Talk:RetroHash

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Label[edit]

I may be wrong, but most sites like Itunes, Hits Daily Double, Amazon and Spotify only list Pale Fire which is his label. The album wasn't released on CD, which a label like Federal Prism would probably have a CD release. And he mentioned in an interview that the album was released fully independent, but like i said i could be wrong. Koala15 (talk) 23:54, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They do not always list every label, just the copyright holder of the music. Before Roth "formed" Pale Fire, singles were released and copyrighted by Federal Prism [1]. More than enough recent sources reference Federal Prism when referring to this album including:

@1Sire: what do you think? STATic message me! 03:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense, i just thought it was odd if it were released by that label that it didn't get a CD release. Koala15 (talk) 04:04, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well Federal Prism is not really that major at all, Convertibles was only released in CD format on Amazon.com with no physical store release to be found. Sad to find out RetroHash did not get a CD release, but it also shows the fan base he has since he still sold a decent amount first week. STATic message me! 04:29, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
When I created the page I only presumed the album would be on Federal Prism, because it was announced he signed back in July 2013 here and his single "Apples & Bananas" was also released by the label, other than that there was no indication that the album would be released under Federal Prism, and when the album's singles and pre-order were released under just Pale Fire, I began to have my doubts. Roth never did officially say the album was under Federal Prism, as far as I know, and those references did come out after this page was created, so I do think it was released only under Pale Fire. 1Sire (talk) 09:24, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What appears on iTunes and other pre-orders is the copyright holder not the record label. As you can see, the references I cited are all from the week of the album's release, and I doubt they were just going after what Wikipedia said. STATic message me! 21:58, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yea you're definitely right about them usually only showing the copyright holder, but to be honest, although it is a big possibility, we really can't know for sure if this album was a Federal Prism release. I've seen the digital booklet and there is no stamps or logos of neither Pale Fire or Federal Prism, so there's nothing there. And [Roth's portfolio] on the Federal Prism website has no mention of RetroHash, but it is for sale on [Roth's website], so the interview where he says it was released fully independent does make me think it's only under Pale Fire, but yea I could be wrong too.1Sire (talk) 01:26, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Federal Prism's website appears to not be updated frequently, so I think that would be a bad place to check, even their store only lists two projects. I think due to the reliable sources I cited above, it would be safe to list it. STATic message me! 01:56, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]