This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
Highly biased article, needs to be cleaned up, brought to Encyclopedia standards. 142.161.108.224 00:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed — this article sounds more like a news column or blog than an encyclopaedia article. It is filled with assertions that are either pure opinion ("Authorities are undoubtedly more open and more responsive to users and to the communities around them than was the former operator," "a skilled ex-politician with a forthright, open manner") or use biased phrasing (e.g., "Federal government policy has been to burden airport authorities with high rents and other charges that force these authorities to apply user fees to passenger tickets in order to raise money for capital improvements" ). The article is further weakened by a dearth of facts and, of course, by the lack of citations. The sole source is a dead link. Mia229 (talk) 12:29, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
