This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Edition size of The First March of Gentlemen, second edition[edit]
The publisher, GOST, claims the second edition of The First March of Gentlemen is in an edition of 650 copies. I see that The Photographers' Gallery site claims it is an edition of 1000. I originally wrote 1000, then changed it to 650. IP address 188.146.224.116 changed it back to 650 copies. Perhaps 188.146.224.116 can help us out with more info? Thanks. -Lopifalko (talk) 13:32, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I tend to think that edition size isn't encyclopedic, unless it's unusually or unexpectedly large or small. Photobooks that don't concentrate on mere clichés typically come in editions in the hundreds; these don't concentrate on clichés and came in editions of hundreds. (Bibliophiliacruft?) -- Hoary (talk) 13:53, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hoary not being a stickler for detail!? Having learned everything I know in the way of such details from you, I am shocked. -Lopifalko (talk) 14:07, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hope you didn't spill your drink! Well, I try to provide the detail necessary to distinguish one book from another, to see if it looks likely to be of interest, and to find it in a good library. Whether there are 449 or 499 copies other than the one in a given person's hands isn't a matter of obvious significance to me. (I also have trouble taking seriously a "limited edition" of x copies, given how often I encounter "HC" and similar examples.) -- Hoary (talk) 14:19, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose another way of looking at is is that publication implies that copies have been made available, that the number of copies is intrinsically important and thus of encyclopedic interest, and the fact that dealers then blather on about "exclusive" and "rare" may be regrettable or hilarious but isn't something WP need worry about. -- Hoary (talk) 13:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Is this a second edition in any real sense of "edition"? It shares the same ISBN as its predecessor. I haven't seen it, but I suspect that it's just a second printing/impression of the same thing. -- Hoary (talk) 13:04, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
