This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
Contested speedy deletion request. Looks like ro:Radu Stanca relevant. Speedy deletion requester gave no reason why Radu Stanca is clearly irrelevant. --Ausgangskontrolle (talk) 22:41, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can you indicate more specifically, in the article if possible. just why Radu Stanca is important or significant? Currently the articel says that he was a member of a movement, but not what he specifically did. it also says that he was an author, but not what he wrote nor what its reception or popularity or effects were. The ro article is longer, but I can not read it, and it appears to be unreferenced (or at least to have no inline citations) in any case. I am not deleting this at the moment, but I am not declining the speedy either. Technically it qualifies for deletion at the moment. DES(talk) 03:29, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Found some more informations and references and added them. More references and content should be found at [1]. This should be enough content now to keep the article. --Ausgangskontrolle (talk) 06:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, the speedy deletion request is already removed here [2]. --Ausgangskontrolle (talk) 06:26, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
