Talk:RFD (magazine)

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-08-02. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Untitled[edit]

There is a lot of good information here and it is well structured but I think there are a few things that might help. There are a lot of quotes and it might help the page if there is more context or explanation around them or in place of them. There are also a few sections that are really short. Would it be possible to combine those integrate them into larger sections? The section on reception of the magazine, in particular, could use a lot of elaboration and explanation. Give some context for the critiques being made about the magazine for more context. Kcowherd (talk) 17:12, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Kcowherd[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sweisent.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]