This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gloucestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gloucestershire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GloucestershireWikipedia:WikiProject GloucestershireTemplate:WikiProject GloucestershireWikiProject Gloucestershire articles
G'day, per the request at WP:MHA I have updated the article checklist to show that structure has been met. I'm not sure about coverage, though. For instance, the article doesn't really explain what a relief landing ground is/was: was it just a grass airstrip? If so, maybe this could be explained. It says that by 1942 it had been redeveloped to full RGL standard. This implies that it wasn't that before, so what was it before? Also, how long was the field? This could possibly be added to the prose. A more complete picture of the types of operations and aircraft flown from it could probably also be provided. Were there any attacks on the airbase during the war, or serious accidents? Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 22:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have added more information relating to coverage and fixed the referencing, so I am now replacing the article for assessment. Thanks for the suggestions. Gavbadger (talk) 23:53, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
G'day, Gav. Your changes look good. I will let someone else do the reassessment, though, just to confirm we are on the right track. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 01:03, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Needs more information when the airfield was decommissioned and sold off to estates, etc., to be complete. B1, though, is good.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:57, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
