Talk:Quercus douglasii

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It would be nice if the page showed that they are deciduous... 76.126.54.65 (talk) 17:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notes to article's first assessing[edit]

Even tho the length of the article places it in stub class, this is a moderately important tree due to its assoication with California as one of the small number of widely distributed native trees in the state. Suzanbanthony 19:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quercus douglasii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130526020933/http://globaltwitcher.auderis.se/gt2/artspec_information.asp?thingid=85046 to http://globaltwitcher.auderis.se/gt2/artspec_information.asp?thingid=85046

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quercus gambelii not a synonym[edit]

I'm removing Quercus gambelii as a synonym, because altho it appears in the source, Q. gambelii is a separate species found hundreds of miles farther East. Also, the source traces to the Kew World Checklist, which mentions a source that doesn't accept it as a synonym: [1] However, if need be we could include it with an appropriate disclaimer. Benny White (talk) 22:35, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Benny White: Do note the crucial author abbreviation at the end. Quercus gambelii Liebm. is a synonym of Quercus douglasii Hook. and Arn., but Quercus gambelii Nutt. is not. — Eru·tuon 22:57, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know, thanks! I added a clarifying note to the article rather than removing it. Benny White (talk) 23:29, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I think having the note will be helpful. — Eru·tuon 02:40, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]