Talk:Quarantine (2008 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Leaked[edit]

Seems a DVD screener was leaked online. Just thought I would make a mention. DragonFire1024 (talk) 01:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Too Long Description[edit]

Do we really need a shot-by-shot description of the movie? The plot "summary" is about 4000 words too verbose. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smmay2 (talk • contribs) 04:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, we could probably do just fine with a general overview. JJ4sad6 (talk) 04:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I took it upon myself to revise the plot section. I cut it down from the original 3300 words, to about 1200. It could still use some additional editing, but at least it's a bit more manageable Stickfigureparade (talk) 06:52, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your revised version talks about an "aforementioned absent Bostonian," but there is no aforementioned Bostonian. 68.224.14.135 (talk) 00:53, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It actually does. When asked about the various tenants, the landlord says there used to be a man from Boston living upstairs, but he hadn't been around for some time. 71.231.89.63 (talk) 00:13, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

== Plot == "scary as HELL!"

I don't know about copyright on Wikipedia, so don't flame me.

I was just wondering (and I'm sure there's a better place to post this), can I throw this on IMDb. Their synopsis is pretty shotty, I'd like to improve it, and I think this is a very nice plot summary. I would give Wikipedia proper credit.

I think this covers it:

2. VERBATIM COPYING

You may copy and distribute the Document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially, provided that this License, the copyright notices, and the license notice saying this License applies to the Document are reproduced in all copies, and that you add no other conditions whatsoever to those of this License. You may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the reading or further copying of the copies you make or distribute. However, you may accept compensation in exchange for copies. If you distribute a large enough number of copies you must also follow the conditions in section 3.

You may also lend copies, under the same conditions stated above, and you may publicly display copies.

Mr T (Based) (talk) 21:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the end[edit]

the infected person was a man in his underware not a woman. LDTREX25 (talk) 21:19, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remake[edit]

This is listed in the film remake category, but nothing indicates what it is a remake of. 216.41.16.82 (talk) 21:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops. Nevermind! 216.41.16.82 (talk) 21:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
At any point in the DVD's documentary sections or commentary, does it acknowledge being a remake? Varlaam (talk) 04:15, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Pictures?[edit]

Is that right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.236.156.47 (talk) 01:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Quarantine (2008 film)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Quarantine was a good movie, good scary moments and so on and so on. What you expect of a kinda of Zombie movie. Something spreading and killing everyone and either there is a survivor and lives or dies. Kinda like Resident Evil. Very good genre.

But there is one little problem with the movie.

When I went to watch it in theaters, I thought it would be great it was, but the problem with the movie was the camera. The camera kept me from liking the movie. In the first 5 minutes of the movie I was already feeling sick, by the end of the movie, I was on the verge to throw up and I did. My head was pounding and I still threw up at home. If the movie wanted camera shots like that, why could they not add some of the scenes with normal movements then throw in some home video camera shots.

If I was a critic I would give this movie a 5 out of 10 because of the movie's camera shots made it impossible to like the movie.

Last edited at 00:17, 16 August 2013 (UTC). Substituted at 03:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quarantine (2008 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Quarantine_(2008_film)&oldid=1207998398"