Talk:Prunus serotina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fruit color[edit]

The difference in fruit color is hardly reliable, as there a chokecherry cultivars with black, red, or yellow fruits. Elakazal 00:24, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Whiskey Cherry??? Wild Black Cherry has been commonly called Rum Cherry by many as it was used to make rum. I have never heard it called Whiskey Cherry ever until this Wikipeda article. I have read many articles on from universities and other creditable sources which refer to it as Rum Cherry and again never Whiskey Cherry. The University of Minnesota's extension service has posts from master gardeners with great insight on this interesting tree. After researching the pros and cons of this tree I planted 6 to replace the buckthorn I removed from my back yard. They are doing great - now I just need a recipe for rum and I will be all set.

Sample article with Rum Cherry reference but no Whiskey: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/pubs/silvics_manual/volume_2/prunus/serotina.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.131.149.147 (talk) 23:10, 10 July 2007‎ (UTC)[reply]

thickness of wild cherry bark[edit]

does the thickness affect the active constituent of the drug wild cherry bark

this is not my opinion, it was recovered from the main page:

The image shown is not the bark of a black cherry tree. Yes, from looking at other sites I'd have to agree--so it needs to be corrected (Cherry bark is smoother, yes?). (THe photo of leaves/blossoms looks okay.) Hey, it's wild cherry, and goes by other names--this is the cough drop you ate as a kid. I came here to find info because I can't trust the grocery to sell me the right stuff. Surely all those boring garden shows have oodles of experts that could help; alas, they aren't computer geeks. I wanted to know why black cherry is different from regular cherry trees, etc.70.241.3.192 13:53, 28 October 2006 (UTC) Al1encas1no 23:55, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(This is my first post on a talk page at wikipedia, so tell me if i'm doing this right) I'm not a professional, but I can do tree identification pretty well after studing ecology for a couple of years. I'm alost certain that that is a correct image of a mature Black Cherry's bark.The bark looks much thinner on younger trees though, and that was probobly what you saw on the other sites. And for the other question, "Wild Cherry" is the asian species, it's the one we use for cough drops and food. Black Cherry is pretty much inediable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masebrock (talk) 19:40, 4 November 2006‎ (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging[edit]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 18:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cherry Colour[edit]

A section refers to the purple colour being a distinguishing factor, comparing with choke-cherries as being usually red. This is plain old not true - choke cherries when mature are generally dark red to purple too. I am amending the article to reflect this. Halogenated (talk) 01:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable Unreferenced Claim[edit]

78.147.6.186 added that "The black cherry is a type of fruit which is commonly used instead of glacier cherries in order to achieve a less sweet taste the significance of this is often most appreciated in cakes which involve dark chocolate such as a black forest gateau and as garnishes to drinks like cocktails". Besides the fact that the user didn't place the sentence in the right section and the fact that it is grammatically incorrect, I was unable to confirm the claim. The user also didn't provide a source. I think its reasonable to hold the claim in question do to these reasons. I improved the grammar and added it to the write section. If anybody thinks the claim is untrue or thinks it should be removed please do so.Chhe (talk) 15:55, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a message for the user on their talk page and added a citation request.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 16:03, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the same vein, I think the poster about cakes and pies is mixing up black cherry, Prunus serotina, a US native, with http://www.nps.gov/shen/naturescience/sweet_cherry.htm sweet cherry, Prunus avium, a European import that is also sometimes called black cherry. Perhaps this is the original poster's reference: http://wizzley.com/black-cherry-prunus-serotina/.

I'd hate to make a pie out of Prunus serotina black cherries. They're tiny (about the size of a pencil eraser) and consist of a thin layer of fruit and skin over a seed that makes up most of the volume. I'd have to include the whole fruit and seed in a pie (eaters beware!) or somehow extract the juice and use it to flavor a pie filled with apples or pears. But I am not dogmatic and would love to hear, if someone has made a Prunus serotina fruit pie, how they did it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.126.132.241 (talk) 21:16, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Meters vs Feet[edit]

What the Hell is a meter? No one in the USA uses the metric system. How about useing feet and inches for the 90 percent who read this website?--68.118.201.68 (talk) 03:49, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the majority of English speakers in the world use the metric system and we in the USA do also. Got any 2 liter drinks in house? Medicines are in milligrams, etc. That said, I've added conversion templates for the metrically-challenged.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:31, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Prunus serotina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:24, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting[edit]

Hello all, What are your thoughts on moving the sections about Subspecies to its own separate section down further in the article since it is not super important in my opinion.

Cheers.Bvalley142 (talk) 00:03, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Prunus serotina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:46, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Prunus_serotina&oldid=1204628015"