Talk:PrestaShop
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 11 August 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
[edit]
This article is more an advertisement than an objective article. Does someone else disagree ? Nimportnawak (talk) 09:53, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
What is PrestaShop?[edit]
The first sentence of the article, the definition, is missing. It does not say "PrestaShop is..." It says "PrestaShop was created in 2005." I have read the whole article and there is not a single sentence that says what PrestaShop actually is.—J. M. (talk) 14:29, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Please don't delete this article[edit]
I wanted to know what is Prestashop and the first thing I clicked in google search for this page. I always click the wikipedia page first whenever researching something new to me. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.189.210.78 (talk) 09:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
¿Como Instalar PrestaShop?[edit]
viendo los rquisitos — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.146.122.29 (talk) 17:05, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Where is Prestashop today?[edit]
I am in the very awkward position of having a strong COI because although I do not work for Presashop in any way whatsoever or contribute to its sales or development, I am a user and a customer since its early days, of its 'pay for' themes, modules, and support services. What was once a leading E-Commerce solution barely gets mentioned in reviews and comparison sites today, and anything I were to say about the current situation of Prestashop's coding, sales policy, and customer support would be WP:OR and not neutral. If I can find some WP:RS, I will, because although I'm basically retired from Wikipedia, the encyclopedia exists to inform, and I'm a stickler to adhering to the policies of en.Wiki. My Wikipedia email always gets prompt replies to anyone who can help. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:00, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
I'd like to add a sentence like "Prestashop 1.6 has been forked, like many open source projects, to retain a low cost-base, various free modules, and the Smarty framework. Version 1.7 runs on the Symphony framework" maybe just before the sentence about funding via partnerships and module sales. But I find Wikipedian pedants (as I see them) so frustrating so I will probably not make an edit. Other peoples' idea of a "point of view", as opposed to a useful fact for a likely reader, is beyond my comprehension and probably beyond logic itself or the small print wiki rules.
Wikipedia's page on Woo Commerce states that it is a fork in the very first sentence, so I hope the obscure rules allow this kind of help to readers somehow or other. Maybe someone more expert can suggest something or link to relevant rules? ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:c7f:dc61:7300:4d21:7202:e3f4:e571 (talk • contribs)
- Prestashop 1.7 has a lot of improvements since its first release in November 2016. I have added some sentences about Prestashop 1.6 End-Of-Line, and Prestashop 1.7 on-going migration to Symfony for a week, and no one complains about it till now. The best-known Prestashop 1.6 fork is thirtybees.com, who like Prestashop 1.6 low cost base and light-weight code can transfer their shop to TB . Of course, do it with their risk. Leemyongpak (talk) 02:23, 24 October 2021 (UTC)