Talk:President of Austria/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs) 07:14, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator: Colonestarrice (talk · contribs) at 22:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria[edit]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments[edit]

I am sorry, but this is going to be a quick-fail due to multiple of the following reasons:

  1. The last GA review was in October 2020, which was failed by Hog Farm for many reasons, which are still not resolved. See Talk:President of Austria/GA1.
  2. There is a lot of uncited text. Almost the entire "History" section, "Executive role", etc. have less or no citations at all. There are lot of good sources like [1], [2], [3], etc.
  3. Suggesting to request a copy-edit at WP:GOCE/REQ. There are lot of prose and WP:MOS issues
  4. Suggesting to remove the list of presidents, we have a separate article on that.

Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]