Talk:Por

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

To keep as a redirect?[edit]

Note that Wikipedia is not a dictionary; it'd be fair to judge if 'power on reset', 'point of record', etc. don't have articles by themselves, then the page would best serve as a redirect to Portugal. ~ PseudoSudo 23:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Power-on_reset has an article. the ones that don't have, will be created and/or written by me or someone else in the future.

what is this Who_(pronoun)? remove it then. it would be best left as an incomplete page. 88.218.27.9 00:01, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough; I expanded the page a bit to meet the disambiguation guidelines. What's wrong with Who (pronoun)? ~ PseudoSudo 00:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

great. you said wikipedia is not a dictionary, that means that is should redirect to wiktionary when you click who_(pronoun). 88.218.27.9 03:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

this is the right one for the country code http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Country_codes:_O-R#Portugal 88.218.27.9 03:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose the merging of the disambiguation page Por into the disambiguation page POR—or vice-versa—due to the fact that the title of the latter page is merely a capitalization of that of the former, and thus the two should merge into a single disambiguation page for the three-letter disambiguation title (with one page ultimately redirecting to the other), rather than confusingly being split into two short disambiguation pages of virtually the same topic as they currently remain. In addition, many of the articles listed on each page are better suited for the other, leading to further inconsistency and confusion. This problem must be resolved as soon as possible. — |J ~Pæst| 02:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:33, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]