Talk:PlayStation/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Vandal

In case someone gets the wrong idea, I blanked the Talk: page because I had originally created it, but then realized I made a huge mistake. But anyways, there's a vandal with IP address 172.209.64.144 who has vandalised several articles relating to Sony. Perhaps this should be reported.(Myscrnnm 03:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC))

PlayStation 4

Could it redirect to this page? Just wonderin'.... TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 22:46, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

I just added some details on the new PS4, it's not perfect yet, but I gave my best :D. 188.60.32.232 (talk) 22:37, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

I put some info about it up from a source I found. JDC808 (talk) 19:31, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Comparison

It would be a good idea to put a comparison section here (like above) toi show the huge difference, also a comparison on the psp, ps2 and ps3 to show what the psp takes from the other two. Just a suggestion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Randyortonfan6 (talk • contribs)

PSOne Software

N/A for system software for the PSone is false. Leaving the disk tray open boots into the PSOne bios where audio CDs can be played, and memory card data can be managed. The PS2 was similar, but it could play DVDs as well. Even the PS2's column for system software features has nothing in it. 66.168.19.135 (talk) 05:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Rating

I upgraded the rating to C-Class. I feel the article is no longer totally incomplete and developing. It is substantial, but it does need resources and cleanup which is what a C-Class article is. Feel free to give a second opinion. BrownsRock10 (talk) 03:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Ps4 and psp2

are fake —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.175.247.51 (talk) 11:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Pages moved  Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:14, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

PlayStation (brand) → PlayStation — Since the launch of the first PlayStation console has developed into a wide brand consisting of numerous consoles, handhelds, controllers, an online service as well as magazines. Thus PlayStation is now more commonly referred to as a brand rather than as simply the first console. In addition the public usually calls the original PlayStation, "PS1" or "PSX" while Sony usually refers to it as the "PSone", this can be seen from their naming of PSone Classics instead of PlayStation Classics and uses the name PlayStation when referring to the brand. Hence the first console should be moved to PlayStation (console) and the brand page should be moved to PlayStation. KiasuKiasiMan (talk) 15:16, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Survey

  • Comment Isn't the first console referred to more popularly as PS1, PSX or original PlayStation? 76.66.192.73 (talk) 20:29, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Support per the nominator's argument that "Playstation" is now more likely to refer to the brand than the console. Propaniac (talk) 20:23, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

I know this has already happened, but I Object. I have started a new section over at WikiProject PlayStation to discuss this, where it is more likely to get attention, so please comment there. AlphathonTM (talk) 15:28, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Expansion

I added alot of new content as well as sections to the article. However it needs to be further expanded with more content as well as examples and citations for the Reception.KiasuKiasiMan (talk) 09:30, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Playstation 4?

Can we see the source? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 9K58 Smerch (talk • contribs) 13:04, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

There is no PlayStation 4 at the moment, so I don't really know what you want a source for.KiasuKiasiMan (talk) 15:43, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

PS9

I don't see a mention of the PS9 commercials that aired during the end of the PS2 generation. Does it not deserve a spot in the main page? 64.6.52.82 (talk) 16:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

I don't really know how notable it is, but if you want to add something just stick it in the marketing section. Don't make it too long though - maybe a line or two at most. AlphathonTM (talk) 16:15, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Peer Review

I've worked hard over the last few months expanding the article on a large scale, I've added numerous new sections covering almost every aspect of PlayStation including its newly created history section, and others such as marketing, online services, games, software and controller sections. I think its time for a peer review of the article since its pretty well detailed as well as well-referenced in every section. Is there anything else I need to clean up or improve upon in the article? Peer Review page.KiasuKiasiMan (talk) 14:24, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Country?

Why does it say "Minami-Aoyama, Minato, Tokyo, Japan" under the country section in the table on the right hand side of the page? If that's the place in Japan Sony's located shouldn't it have a more fitting name? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.164.130.93 (talk) 14:23, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:PlayStation/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Basic GA Criteria

  1. Well-written: ✓ Pass
  2. Verifiable: ✗ Fail - a few sources should either have more information added to them than just an URL and a title. Preferably, use a template such as Cite web or Cite news.
     Fixed by editors while the article was on hold. elektrikSHOOS 05:06, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
  3. Broad in coverage: ✓ Pass
  4. Neutral: ✗ Fail - The article contains a controversy section. In the past, dedicated controversy/criticism sections have been seen as jeopardizing the neutrality of an article. If possible, information in that section should be integrated into other sections where applicable. I've tagged the section appropriately to alert interested editors.
     Fixed by editors while the article was on hold. elektrikSHOOS 05:06, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
  5. Stable: ✓ Pass - Other than the typical vandal I don't see any edit wars or other such disputes which would compromise the integrity of the article.
  6. Illustrated: ✓ Pass - All images are properly tagged and licensed (fair-use-wise). I'd personally look to add more but I don't see the existing amount as not being enough. (If that makes sense.)

Reviewer: elektrikSHOOS 19:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

As per the recommendations, all references on the page use a Cite Web template while the controversy section of the article has been removed and reintegrated into the Marketing section with a neutral section. The article has also been better illustrated with additional images.KiasuKiasiMan (talk) 14:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations, thanks for fixing! Now go for FA class! elektrikSHOOS 05:08, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Sony Xperia Play Android Phone

Does anyone think it would be a good idea to add a little section on the Xperia Play phone, since it is related to the PSP? --Gamer5KOs (talk) 01:42, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Seems fair enough to me - even if it wasn't related to the PSP, it is PlayStation certified. Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.ðɒn/ (talk) 01:56, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Plenty of material available in the main article Sony Ericsson Xperia Play - X201 (talk) 09:08, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't at least get a mention here - it is part of the PlayStation franchise and is a major device (it's not like it's some obscure accessory or something). What I meant was along the same lines that the NGP is talked about, so just a sentence or two with a main article link. Heck, if the PocketStation gets a mention then I see no reason not to include the Xperia Play as well. Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.ðɒn/ (talk) 11:23, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
I didn't say it shouldn't, and wasn't inferring such either; just providing the link as a help, because it hadn't been mentioned in the discussion. - X201 (talk) 12:15, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Oh, I see - my mistake. Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.ðɒn/ (talk) 12:24, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

What about the eyetoy

"The PlayStation Move for the PlayStation 3 is the brand's first foray into the motion gaming industry."

Would not the Eyetoy be considered as motion gaming? Should not this statement be deleted?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.177.128 (talk) 02:17, 18 April 2011

In fact I'll delete it right now! Thanks wikipedia for giving me this power.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.177.128 (talk) 02:17, 18 April 2011

Playstation TV

At E3, Sony revealed a Playstation-branded 3D TV. Doesn't that deserve a mention? Loligator (talk) 22:06, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Probably just a passing mention, but I don't see why it shouldn't be included… especially given that we already have the Sony BRAVIA KDL22PX300 (a TV with integrated PS2) listed. Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.θɒn/ (talk) 02:01, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Slogans?

Are the list of slogans really that relevant to the campaign section? the list doesn't seem to accomplish anything and it seems to make the article look a bit messy (but then again the excess of images also seems to make it look messy). Maybe a quick clean up would do?Lucia Black (talk) 09:01, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, the marketing sections have been one of those things that I've always been meaning to write. I have the source material for both Sony and Sega articles. They are important subjects because they both changed the way video games were marketed, and I could easily expand it to a standalone article given time. But that's the problem. Time. - X201 (talk) 10:13, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
think they should be merged then, rather than listing them.Lucia Black (talk) 10:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

1986?

"The console's origins date back to 1986 where it was originally a joint project between Nintendo and Sony to create a CD-ROM for the Super Nintendo." I have a feeling two separate thoughts were merged over time, i.e. the origins of Sony's home entertainment business and the particulars of Playstation's creation. Neither Super Nintendo nor CD-ROM were anywhere near the radar in 1986, and I highly doubt "Game Over" can be considered an authoritative source on any of this considering it was written about two years before the Playstation's release. Whelkman (talk) 20:31, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

  • Game Over is being misquoted: the book says the deal was signed in 1988. Kutaragi first proposed a joint Sony-Nintendo project of some kind in 1986 but was rebuffed by Nintendo. This was not the PlayStation. Game Over is perfectly reliable for these matters (when properly quoted) because the original Sony-Nintendo PlayStation was being worked on from late 1989 and the public snubbing of Sony came in 1991, which all happened during the period of time the book covers. Indrian (talk) 20:55, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Mascot

I'm wondering if there's a notable reason to mention PlayStation mascots, or rather the lack of one. Sure, Japan kind of had Toro (for Sony as a whole), but while Nintendo had Mario and Sega had Sonic, PlayStation had a bunch of unofficial contenders (like Crash Bandicoot and Abe). Could go in the PSX page, or here, or nowhere at all. JaffaCakeLover (talk) 14:31, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

It had a mascot, briefly. See Polygon Man - X201 (talk) 10:09, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
The closest there is to a real Playstation mascot would be Sackboy from Little Big Planet. Unless I'm mistaken, Microsoft doesn't have a mascot for their XBox range either; in fact the only games platform with a real mascot is Nintendo, who continue to use Mario for their mascot as they have since the early 80's. Since Nintendo is currently the only manufacturer with a persistent and recognisable mascot in the video games business, I find Sony's lack of a mascot unremarkable. If Sony ever choose to adopt an official mascot for their brand, it's inclusion would be justified in this article, though I don't believe the lack of a mascot is worth noting since there's nothing tangible to add.Pobatti (talk) 07:53, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Playstation 4

It redirects here, but there are enough sources (of rumours, no doubt) to warrant that it gets its own page, rather than a redirect. Techradar hes plenty of links here: [1] and lots of rumours [2] and news [3]. Unflavoured (talk) 08:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

All we have so far is rumour, so making an article on the subject would be a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Alphathon /'æɫ.fə.θɒn/ (talk) 17:34, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Sony PlayStation 4 Price

Sony PlayStation 4 price is $100 less than the forthcoming Xbox One console. I'm wondering what the impact of that pricing difference will have as far as the number on units sold? Perhaps, some statistical analysis could be provided as this seems to give Sony PlayStation 4 a distinct edge with gaming consumers. Gameweed (talk) 23:59, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

That would be Original Research and Speculation, neither of which is allowed on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.128.246.133 (talk) 11:59, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Exactly what was said above. Et3rnal 16:29, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

The PlayStation logo is both the "PS" logo currently used and the "PlayStation" logo. Both should be used since hey are the logo.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.234.92.149 (talk) 09:07, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

On the PS1's design

Can likely replace the "gamesreview2010" usage I am no longer watching this page—ping if you'd like a response – czar 13:57, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

The title of this article?

I'm genuinely curious why Xbox and PlayStation are the only two consoles which have product family pages which share titles with an actual product which is part of that line. Obviously this leads to a situation where the actual articles for the consoles are relegated to Xbox (console) and PlayStation (console) which seems pretty weird to me. Conversely the product family article for the Game Boy is called Game Boy line, I think rightly so since, when talking about the Game Boy, people are likely to think of the original device rather than every consequent iteration of said device which have different names.

In case people are wondering, yes I was the person who previously asked about the "product family" of the Wii U. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.175.155.10 (talk) 18:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

You can view the most recent requested move from 2010 which resulted in the change. There wasn't a lot of feedback on the move, but it seems the notion that the "PlayStation is now more commonly referred to as a brand rather than as simply the first console" was convincing enough. I didn't dig into the archives at the Xbox article, but I imagine it was for the same reasons. --GoneIn60 (talk) 01:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on PlayStation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:45, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on PlayStation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on PlayStation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 23 external links on PlayStation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Net Yaroze

Can a knowledgeable user review the net yaroze section..seems like it waffles between describing a ps1 and ps2

Coolguy132435 (talk) 05:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)Coolguy132435 12/21

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on PlayStation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Backwards Compatibility

Shouldn't it be mentioned that the PS3 originally had backwards compatability but was removed in later models due to complaints and cost? Yogneir (talk) 12:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on PlayStation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:06, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

COI edit requests

Hi! I work for a communications agency that represents Sony Interactive Entertainment. I'd like to suggest some updates to this article:

  • In the "PlayStation Blog" section: Replace Jack Tretton, President and Chief Executive Officer of Sony Computer Entertainment.[1] with Shawn Layden, President, SIEA, and Chairman, SIE Worldwide Studios.[2]
  • Also in the "PlayStation Blog" section, can we add this sentence: In addition to English-language blogs targeted to the U.S.[3] and UK[4] regions, PlayStation Blog also has localized sites for France,[5] Italy,[6] Germany,[7] Spain,[8] Russia,[9] Latin America[10] and Brazil,[11] in each region's common language.

References

  1. ^ Jack Tretton (October 19, 2009). "Welcome to the PlayStation Nation". PlayStation Blog. Retrieved March 25, 2010.
  2. ^ Layden, Shawn (1 April 2016). "A New Chapter in the Story of PlayStation". PlayStation Blog. Retrieved 19 August 2017.
  3. ^ "PlayStation Blog". PlayStation Blog. Sony Interactive Entertainment. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  4. ^ "PlayStation Blog Europe". PlayStation Blog Europe. Sony Interactive Entertainment. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  5. ^ "PlayStation Blog en français". PlayStation Blog en français. Sony Interactive Entertainment. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  6. ^ "Il Blog Italiano di PlayStation". Il Blog Italiano di PlayStation. Sony Interactive Entertainment. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  7. ^ "Der deutschsprachige PlayStation Blog". Der deutschsprachige PlayStation Blog. Sony Interactive Entertainment. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  8. ^ "PlayStation.Blog en español". PlayStation.Blog en español. Sony Interactive Entertainment. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  9. ^ "Российский блог - ваш главный источник новостей из мира PlayStation". Российский блог. Sony Interactive Entertainment. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  10. ^ "PlayStation.Blog LATAM". PlayStation.Blog LATAM. Sony Interactive Entertainment. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  11. ^ "PlayStation.Blog BR". PlayStation.Blog BR. Sony Interactive Entertainment. Retrieved 17 November 2017.

Due to my COI, I won't be editing the article directly. I'd really appreciate any help or feedback. Thank you! AngelaMPena (talk) 15:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

I've added Layden and marked Tretton as former. I am declining to add the links for the non-English sites, as we do not suggest the site is English only and so there's no need. Including all of this only serves to embed external links to those sites, which is not our purpose. Additionally, they are already linked at the main article for PlayStation Blog. Here, we should only have the most pertinent summary details. -- ferret (talk) 15:18, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Thank you so much! AngelaMPena (talk) 17:59, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on PlayStation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:13, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2018

Dsoliver18 (talk) 15:58, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Change the link #179 to https://dmarket.com/blog/pc-vs-console-what-to-choose-in-2018/

 Not done: Why? The provided link does not support any of the information that cites source 179. Saucy[talk – contribs] 21:31, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 September 2018

Dsoliver18 (talk) 08:04, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Reference #179 is dead. Here is the new article with the same info https://dmarket.com/blog/pc-vs-console-what-to-choose-in-2018/. Check it, please and add it

 Not done: @Dsoliver18: Blogs are generally not reliable sources. Please don't add such links (in most cases). You'll find detailed information about Wikipedia's criteria for reliable sources at WP:RS. GermanJoe (talk) 10:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2018

I want to change this page, I work by Playstation, and i found some things that has to change. Jamber321 (talk) 08:30, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

You need to state what change you want to make in the form of "Change x to y" - X201 (talk) 09:29, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

"PlayStation 5 (version 2)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect PlayStation 5 (version 2). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — Searingjet (talk) 12:16, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

A few suggestions

The PocketStation. This product is more of a peripheral or an accessory to the PS1 rather than a standalone handheld system.

Sony Ericsson Xperia Play and Sony tablets although PlayStation certified are not really products of the PlayStation line.

PSVR would considered to be an accessory to the PS4 and PS5 (with a SIE provided adapter) instead of "other hardware".

Although Sony called the "PS1 Slim" PSOne, they never branded any of their consoles with "Slim". Suggesting to include the model series such as (SCPH-70000 series & CECH-2000 series) as how Sony identifies each revision models while quoting or parenthesis words like Slim or Super Slim to identify their model release stage.

The official LCD screen attachment for the PSOne an official first-party PlayStation peripheral should be mentioned.


Wfrmsf (talk) 10:23, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

"Playstation 6" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Playstation 6. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 13#Playstation 6 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. User:milkmankarlson (Talk) 13:26, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

fix principle/principal usage

The final paragraph of the Origins section (talking about the logo) misuses "principle". Please change "four bright principle colors" to "four bright principal colors".

 Done RudolfRed (talk) 22:25, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:PlayStation/Archive_1&oldid=1216727606"