Talk:Plato and a Platypus Walk Into a Bar

Philosophy: Literature / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Contemporary philosophy

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Please do not delete this article, I thought I followed all the guidelines This book deserves to have an article for it because of the success and the following it has and the fact that it a best seller. Indeliblevision (talk) 20:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Success? Following? Best seller? I've replaced the speedy deletion with a maintenance tag for now, but we need to see information substantiating those claims. —Latischolar^talk_{contributions} 20:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

I will add in additional reference links to news articles and best seller lists. Can you please recommend any other additions to substantiate my claims on this article?

Thanks again for your guidance on my 1st article. Indeliblevision (talk) 20:58, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That should establish notability. The article could use some cleanup, though; I'll get around to it sometime. —Latischolar^talk_{contributions} 21:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks, I just added in some links to news article and best seller lists. Thanks again. Indeliblevision (talk) 21:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision Update[edit]

Apologies for being absent; I was sidetracked by a surprisingly lively AfD debate. I think that, looking past its shortcomings, this is a pretty good start for one's first article. It does need to be substantially restructured, however, but since I'm a rather slow editor and I don't want the article namespace polluted with heavily experimental edits, I've copied the article to my user space to play around with and as a visual aid for discussing my ideas for changes. That page is here, but please post comments about those changes here instead. Meanwhile, after looking further into things, I think you've given this article a fabulous start, and I see enough potential for eventual good article status at the least. —Latischolar^talk_{contributions} 18:57, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

No worries thank you again for taking interest. May we please remove the advertisement header at the top?

Thanks and take care.

Indeliblevision (talk) 19:41, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]