Talk:Plano Stone Church

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineePlano Stone Church was a Art and architecture good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 15, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 18, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the Plano Stone Church (pictured) was constructed in 1868 to serve as the world headquarters for the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints under the leadership of Joseph Smith III?

GA review[edit]

A good article about a building that was a notable part of history/religious evolution. Some points of curiousity that a reader may be interested in knowing more about

  • Do we know why he moved to Plano in the first place and why he eventually moved?
  • Do we know of any important meetings or decisions that were made by the Church while it was based in the church. Do we know how many people the church could fit and what the attendance figures were in those days?
  • Did Smith use the building as a political office?
  • The article implies that the building was still used for religion after Smith left. I think this should be made explicit. Do we have any details on the 120+ years since then, because there is something of a gap
  • One of the architecture paras needs a ref
  • If there was any religious considerations in the architectural design, it should probably be noted.
  • A general expansion is always good!

Apart from that the prose/NPOV/OR/RS/COPYVIO facets are in order. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:33, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Um, I had marked this article for review and was in the middle of a review (I did some copy editing yesterday). Should I just remove that tag now? Awadewit | talk 01:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • oh dear... I just took the article home yesterday and started writing up. I normally don't use the "under review" tag because it irritated some people.....I should've checked to see that you reserved it....Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:04, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I meant to copy edit it and then post my review right away last night, but I was falling asleep after the copy edit and I wanted to read the article again. I'll just let you take it from here. Awadewit | talk 01:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since Ivo is indefinitely away, I have failed this article. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]