Talk:Phone Booth (film)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2019 and 11 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dpasiewicz.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary...[edit]

...needs a major rewrite. I haven't seen the film, so I can't do it myself without accidentally leaving out a few major details, but the style of writing is very unprofessional. --Gafaddict 17:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, the girls trying to use the phone booth were hookers, not dancers, and it wasn't their "manager" it was their pimp.--Enigmatick 21:23, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i think the year of release is 2002 and not 2003. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.193.224.105 (talk) 13:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, the the production-date was 2002, but the release-date 2003.

Ikr. (talk) 12:22, 9 July 2019 (UTC)ROBLOXGamingDavid[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Stu Shepard (Colin Farrell).jpg[edit]

Image:Stu Shepard (Colin Farrell).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Phone Booth movie.jpg[edit]

Image:Phone Booth movie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Caller[edit]

Is it just me or does Kiefer Sutherland's appearance as The Caller look alot like Paul Marcarelli's Verizon guy?--Bushido Hacks (talk) 03:51, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Respect guys. I heard that the film was originally shot with another Caller/Voice over and that Kiefer Sutherland was a late addition to the film and "the callers" scenes were reshot... anyone back this up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.220.82.192 (talk) 00:52, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rapper reference[edit]

In the beginning Stu talks to some white Rapper. In the audio-commentary the director says "this is a little satire on...I don't have to tell you, you know who if you're smart". Well, since I'm retarded and not very bright, I have no clue. Which WhiteTrashSonOffaMoFo is skitted there? Yo, Man, peace brother!--93.133.197.241 (talk) 03:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Release Date[edit]

I do not know why would the infobox says it was released on April 4, 2002. That was way too early for that, and it was 5 or 6 months before the D.C. sniper attacks. The production studio postponed the movie released until 2003. Whoever who undid my editing, when I changed it to April 4, 2003, please stop doing this, and do not assume that I am vandalizing this article.

(P.S.: If you think i am, and if you don't care, suck it.) >:I — Preceding unsigned comment added by ROBLOXGamingDavid (talk • contribs) 12:20, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]