Talk:Phase One (company)

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Photography

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Powerphasecmyk.jpg[edit]

Image:Powerphasecmyk.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FireWire --> IEEE 1394 ?[edit]

Hi there. I've been reading through the Phase One article and noticed that it said "Camera back connects through standard 6pin firewire." I've since changed this to "6pin FireWire" (the correct capitalization), but the page FireWire redirects to IEEE 1394 interface. Should we change FireWire in this context to the more generic term (FireWire refers to Apple's IEEE 1394) or leave it as is? I'd appreciate your opinion. Thanks! Mononomic (talk) 01:29, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to replace this in 1 month if there are no contraindications. Mononomic (talk) 03:44, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Mononomic (talk) 05:15, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Product Technical Data[edit]

Since resolution and Dynamic Range has been added, it would be beneficial to add: Pixel Pitch, Pixel Bit Depth and SMI.

Note[edit]

This is an encyclopedia article, not a product page for the company. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:52, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, this is the right page to discuss the contents of the article. The page will be rolled back until a consensus is found. Thank you for contributing.. signed:Donan Raven (talk) 22:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Donan.raven: Not sure what to make of your comment or rollback. A rollback on behalf of third parties is not a solution when the third parties don't participate in discussion. Do you have a comment on the material? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:25, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unilaterally deleting the content without reaching an agreement with fellow contributing editors is not the way forward in *any* case. Since I am asked an opinion, I agree that the page needs more references and that some slightly commercial content be thrown out, but as has been suggested by the other editors, other camera manufacturer pages include product description and this is held to be good practice, so throwing out the tables is OK *only* if other contributing editors agree.. signed:Donan Raven (talk) 23:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Donan.raven: See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and unilaterally deleting content is the way forward in many cases if the content does not adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. And agreement isn't going to be reached if editors who want to retain the content don't participate on talk pages. In this case, company articles are not product catalogs. The content may qualify for it's own article as a "List of..." article if it can be properly sourced. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:18, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Phase One (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:43, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

160930 PhaseOne 1548.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:07, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]