Jump to content

Talk:Peterotica

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peterotica has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 9, 2006	Articles for deletion	Kept
August 16, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Animation: Family Guy Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Family Guy work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Archives

GA Nomination[edit]

Well Written
Written in Prose, spelling and grammar are fine.

Has decent lead section, is well laid out and doesn't read in an "in-universe" style
Factually Accurate and Verifiable
Contains no OR, is accurate and sourced appropriately. Sources are reliable with no use of blogs/fansites.
Broad in coverage
Covers the main plot and production details well. Does not diverge into discussion of wider areas.
Neutral
Stable
Well maintained with no edit wars or frequent reversions
Images
uses one appropriate image which is sourced and copyright available.

I review this article as a pass for GA status. Well done, perhaps the nominator may like to review an article now? --Brideshead_{(leave a message)} 11:53, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Peterotica&oldid=1209728412"

Hidden category:

Deletion to Quality Award candidates