Talk:Personal Affair
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Reductive[edit]
Reducing the whole film to a warning that "to see love only as an intellectual excuse for poetic moralizing may lead to tragic consequences" is very subjective and simplistic. Can we merely read those sixteen words and save ourselves the time of watching the film?Lestrade (talk) 18:14, 14 August 2010 (UTC)Lestrade
- Feel free to do so ... but i, for one, found the film fascinating in its open-endedness. The questions that remain after so many of the characters have told lies and created fabrications lead one down many paths. I compare the story line to that of Le Corbeau (1943), but i liked it far better because in this movie the viewer, not the screenwriter, is left to pick up the pieces at the end. Catherineyronwode (talk) 03:03, 19 March 2024 (UTC)