Talk:PeopleMover (Disneyland)/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Untitled

"usually always"? :-)

Haha, I probably meant to say "nearly always." Now it just says "usually." :) --Lyght 02:14, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

unreliable?

The PeopleMover was always a popular attraction, despite the fact that it was unreliable, and took the lives of two guests, although the guests were at fault for jumping out of their cars, and were crushed by oncoming trains.

Firstly, this seems kind of weird considering it's under the heading 'Deaths'. The focus of the sentence seems to be on the popularity despite the deaths, not on the deaths themselves.

Also, there's nothing anywhere in the article that indicates why it's 'unreliable'. Shouldn't someone qualify that statement somewhere?

Some kind of external reference to confirm the fact of these deaths would be good too. -Dalziel 86 07:13, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Okay, I don't know why I wrote that part the way I did, but I know for a fact the attraction did claim the lives of two guests jumping cars. I guess I thought unreliable because there wasn't enough safety equipment to protect these kids from jumping their cars. --Lyght 05:12, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

It's not Disney's fault for kids PURPOSELY getting out of the vehicles. It'd be unreliable if the people fell out of the car unwillingly, such as the door opening by accident, and the person falling out.Ramfan2772 20:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it's just like saying Pirates of the Caribbean or It's a Small World killed people because there weren't any safety measures, or what about the train that goes around the parks? Nothing can hold back morons who jump from moving vehicles. --blm07 21:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Nothing that was on the ride. If there were seatbelts (which I don't recall when I went in 1995), then there would be. Something could have, but it didn't —Coastergeekperson 04^{'s talk}@01/04/2008 00:05

First sentence

In the line (July 2, 1967—August 21, 1995) sounds like a person. PeopleMover was not a person, it was a ride. Should something be done to this, or w=should it just be removed because it's in the infobox? —Coastergeekperson 04^{'s talk}@01/04/2008 00:04

I have a PEOPLEMOVER LImeted Edition Pin

Vote to Smush Rocket Rods page and Peoplemover Page together.

Who thinks so? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.212.241.113 (talk) 21:32, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on PeopleMover. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)