Talk:Pensions crisis

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Taxation (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sociology

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Title change[edit]

I suggest we change the title to U.S. pensions crisis and focus on that. A global pensions crisis article would be too wide-ranging.Farcaster (talk) 19:52, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. A lot of the same issues are facing most of the developed nations. I don't object to having an article about the pension crisis in the U.S., but I think we should also have an article about the global pension crisis. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 05:07, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it stays global. I'll compartmentalize the U.S. stuff over the next couple of weeks.Farcaster (talk) 16:28, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't look as if that compartmetalization happened. It's stll an article largely relevant to US only. Certainly it idn't particularly useful for teh UK, with no mention of teh insane tax changes inroduced by George brown which effectivelt destroyed the financial basis on which most UK pension funds were based. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.49.189.145 (talk) 01:52, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Need some work on this???? MaynardClark (talk) 06:47, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Intro Needs Rewording[edit]

The intro says "...the predicted difficulty paying for corporate or government employment retirement pensions"

The difficulty is not "predicted" the difficulty is a reality. The only prediction is wether it will compound to be a catastrophic issue. It is a fact that many states, counties and cities have already reduced services and reappropriated funds from infrastructure to pay for pensions. this article highlights studies and instances that highlight that cuts to fundamental services to pay pension debt has already started. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnmauldin/2019/05/20/the-coming-pension-crisis-is-so-big-that-its-a-problem-for-everyone/#7cf377eb37fc

68.7.65.150 (talk) 17:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)RobertRemembers[reply]

Govt confiscation of private pensions/401Ks/IRAs etc[edit]

A quick search showed that variations on this topic are discussed as one remedy to social security benefit issue and/or general debt/solvency issues and evidently there are some real world examples. I found one relevant to solutions section which will put in. CSMonitor article infers govts not trustworthy in their use of the money, but if I find something more substantial about using pension money to cover other expenses can consider issue more. CarolMooreDC 16:40, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Carol. What does that have to do with the pension crisis that is the subject of the article? Neither of the sources you added use the phrase. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:29, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article about solutions is biased. Who propose the confiscation of private plans? It is not the third way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.25.147.21 (talk) 09:08, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Globalize[edit]

There has been discussion above about expanding the scope of the article beyond the U.S. I think it's a valid point. JonathanPlaster 06:48, 4 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JonathanPlaster (talk • contribs)

Govt borrowing from pensions funds[edit]

^[1] " When inflows exceed outflows a surplus exists which is invested in “special issue” government bonds. These bonds are then held in trust and the money is used to fund other government programs."

"money is used to fund other government programs" means that if government does not pay back what is owed because government is bankrupt then "pensions crisis". 68.151.148.46 (talk) 20:49, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/2013/06/12/is-the-social-security-trust-fund-solvent/#27cf9db475fd

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Pensions crisis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/2013/06/12/is-the-social-security-trust-fund-solvent/#27cf9db475fd

[1]