Talk:Patricia Remak

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

My compliments for a well balanced article! MoiraMoira (talk) 17:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"These allegations were connected to payments of almost 28.000 euro to a assistant of the fraction who also worked at the company of Remak's husband."[edit]

It's great to see that there's no censureship here opposed to the Dutch version of Wikipedia. In my opinion the word also should be removed. The fact that the province filed a complaint for fraude and forgery implies that that 'assistent' actually didn't work for the fraction. To make the article more biassed we should remove the word "also" because it's likely that that person didn't work for the fraction while it's certain that he/she worked fr Remak's husband's company. 193.190.253.149 (talk) 00:36, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Patricia Remak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:59, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]