Talk:Pasta de Conchos mine disaster

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Multiple footnotes to the same reference will not work: you must insert two uniquely named footnotes."[edit]

The referencing in this article is wrong. The numbering goes up to 9, but there are only 5 items listed at the end. I tried to fix all the footnotes and got myself so confused, and didn't save anything after a few previews. I give up. Can anyone more familiar with footnotes take over, please ? -- PFHLai 06:02, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, how do you cite two unique facts from one article? Mike H. That's hot 06:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know. Listing the source more than once at the end ? But then each time a different tag has to be used .... I'm lost .... -- PFHLai 06:11, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I can do a different ref but I just thought that sort of thing would defeat the purpose. If that's all I have to do it'll be relatively easy to change. I can do it tomorrow. Mike H. That's hot 06:19, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The citation style described in m:Cite.php is far easier to keep track of and allows for multiple citation of the same item. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 11:39, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I changed to the (now) normal ref style. Lubrom (talk) 18:27, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pasta de Conchos mine disaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]