Talk:Oxford Royale Academy

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Request for Clarification on Reverted Edits to Oxford Royale Academy Page[edit]

I dedicated a considerable amount of time to enhancing the quality of the Oxford Royale Academy page. Initially, I refined the English for clarity and coherence. Additionally, I incorporated Wikipedia hyperlinks to key information within the page to enrich it further. It's important to note that I neither added nor removed any content; my sole contribution was the inclusion of a logo. I'm perplexed as to why my modifications were entirely reverted without any justification. Could you please provide some insight into this decision? Naxh (talk) 10:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Naxh: The major concern was that you removed referencing without explanation i.e. your edits reduced the number of citations in the References section from 47 citations by 10 down to 37. However, on further review, you did make some enhancements so I have restored some of those. You can continue to edit and clean up, but please 1) be careful not to delete things unless necessary, 2) use the edit summary to explain any significant deletions or changes; 3) be careful of overlinking common terms. Hope this explains things. Dl2000 (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, and thank you for your comment. I edit only during my free time, as I enjoy reading Wikipedia pages. The references I removed were eliminated due to redundancy or because they were no longer functional. I appreciate your contributions, great work! Naxh (talk) 12:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]