Talk:Out of This Club

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleOut of This Club has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 16, 2022Good article nomineeListed

Song or Single[edit]

Should this not be classified as a "song" because there's no post release coverage which suggests that it was cancelled? It didn't receive any independent release commercially and there's little or NO coverage after the release date saying it was a single in the US? → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - (Talk) - 13:56, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's officially sent to the radio, so it was indeed a single in a similar way as "Fly Like a Bird", "I Care", "Hold Tight". Bluesatellite (talk) 13:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Love how you went from not considering it a single to undoing all my edits on this page because I think the same way. No shade, I just find it funny.

Honestly though (this is just me putting in my two cents), if a song didn't receive a commercial release in a single country and wasn't promoted individually, it's just a promotional single or better yet an album cut which just happened to chart. Moonlighttt (talk) 15:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A radio release is a commercial release. There are plenty of songs that are sent only to radio. In the streaming era, song are already available digitally. It's definitely not a album cut that charted - there's a source saying it was sent to radio stations in the US. iTunes countdown singles are released commercially but not to radio - that doesn't make them singles just promo ones. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ If we're not sure go by consensus. On the basis that some notable songs linked by Bluesatellite were only sent to radio they count as singles. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 20:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Out of This Club/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:38, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will conduct this review today! --K. Peake 09:38, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

  • Shouldn't the studio be identified as The Chocolate Factory?
  •  Done Sorry, misread the booklet.
  • Pipe Chicago, Illinois to Chicago in the infobox
  •  Done
  • "It features its songwriters Polow da Don and its producer" → "The song features guest appearances from record producer Polow da Don and singer"
  •  Done
  • Add a sentence after the above one mentioning who wrote and produced it
  •  Done
  • "In the United States the song" → "In the United States, the song"
  •  Done
  •  Not done Piped it to Kelly#Exposure of child sexual abuse material and indictment (2002)
  • Simply change the "over" part of comp to mentioning piano melodies, minus any quotation marks
  •  Done
  • "It received mixed reviews from contemporary critics who either complimented or criticized" → "The song received mixed reviews from music critics, who were split towards"
  •  Done
  • "platforms following new allegations" → "platforms, following new allegations"
  •  Done

Production and release[edit]

  • "and Jamal "Polow Da Don" Jones," → "and Jamal "Polow da Don" Jones," with the pipe
  •  Done Scrap my comment.
    •  Comment: Hmm, sorry, don't follow. =]
  • "collaborated with the latter who, previously" → "collaborated with the record producer, who previously" to be specific
  •  Done
  •  Done
  • "Jeff Meeks and Eric Schlotzer" → "Jeff Meeks, and Eric Schlotzer"
  •  Done
  • Remove overly obvious wikilink on Chicago, Illinois
  •  Done
  •  Done
  •  Done
  •  Done
  • Remove the comma after second studio album
  •  Done
  •  Done
  • Remove the comma after second single
  •  Done
  • "follows Kelly's acquittal" → "came a couple of months after Kelly's acquittal" removing the part from the end of the sentence in this context
  •  Done

Composition and reception[edit]

  • Audio sample looks good!
  • ""Out of This Club" is" → "Musically, "Out of This Club" is"
  •  Done
  • ""midtempo jam",[3] production is" → ""mid-tempo jam",[3] the production is" per the source
  •  Done
  • ""plush beat" which results" → ""plush beat", which results"
  •  Done
  • "a cascading fashion" with the artists" → "a cascading fashion", with the artists"
  •  Done
  • "According Joey Guerra from the" → "According to Joey Guerra from the"
  •  Done
  •  Done
  • The party lifestyle part is not sourced
  •  Comment: You mean to remove the pipe to Playboy lifestyle
  • "is a possbile" → "is a possible"
  •  Done
  •  Done
  • "Polow Da Don's rap line," → "Polow da Don's rap line,"
  •  Done
  • "which was produced by himself." → "which he had previously produced."
  •  Done
  • "and producer commenting he is" → "and producer, commenting he is"
  •  Done
  • "and noted down" → "and he noted down"
  •  Done
  • "didn't expect anything else from Kelly characterizing it" → "lacked expectations for Kelly, characterizing the song"
  •  Done
  • "criticized Kelly's songwriting describing it as" → "derided Kelly's songwriting as"
  •  Done
  • "as "phoned-in" adding he" → "as "phoned-in", adding he"
  •  Done
  • "lambasted "Out Of This Club" highlighting it" → "lambasted "Out Of This Club", pinpointing it"
  •  Done
  •  Done
  • Add the Bubbling Under position as the final para of this section, as that is commercial reception
  •  Done

Chart[edit]

  • "which represents the 25 songs which failed" → "which represented the 25 songs that failed" since the chart no longer exists
  •  Done
  • Make this the section after removal
  •  Done

Removal from album and sale[edit]

  •  Done
  • "Beginning April of that year," → "Beginning April 2019,"
  •  Done
  • "with Heat magazine member Kimberly Wyatt" → "with Heat magazine, member Kimberly Wyatt"
  •  Done
  • "was out of the group's hands." → "was out of the group's hands:"
  •  Done

References[edit]

  • Copyvio score looks fairly decent at 36.7%!!
  • Cite Radio & Records as work/website instead on ref 4
  •  Done
  • Remove the publisher from ref 7
  •  Done
  •  Done
  •  Done

Final comments and verdict[edit]

  •  On hold until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 21:21, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hey, thanks for doing this! I have done the edits! MrHyacinth (talk) 02:59, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Kyle Peake: Onegreatjoke (talk) 23:39, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Pass now, nice job on this! --K. Peake 08:56, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Valereee (talk) 22:50, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by MrHyacinth (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 23:18, 20 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Good article! Hook is interesting, article is adequately sourced, meets length requirements, etc.  Ploni💬  03:03, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]