Talk:Omni

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Scale the Summit discography#Monument|Monument]] The anchor (#Monument) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Computer maker[edit]

Wasn't there a computer manufacturer in the 1990s named Omni? 2fort5r (talk) 21:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Computer language[edit]

OMNI is also a proprietary programming language, more fully the OMNI Model Management System, see: https://www.haverly.com/main-products/13-products/15-omni The owner is Haverly Systems. This language does not yet have a Wikipedia page. If and when it does, it can be added to this disambiguation page. Best wishes. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 13:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Solar wind data source[edit]

The OMNIWeb data portal (https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov) is used extensively in space physics to access "OMNI" data. It provides solar wind data and quantities derived from those data in one interface, either for plotting or download. There is information about the low-resolution OMNI (LRO) data here: https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/html/overview.html and high-resolution OMNI (HRO) data here: https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/html/omni_min_data.html . This database has been around and used since the 1970s. It would be useful to add a page for the OMNI dataset(s), so that basic information about the data, its origin, its history, etc., could be provided. Some of this is scattered over the OMNIWeb site, but often not in an obvious or easily-accessible way. (Much of the documentation on the site is *very* detailed and/or technical, and so not readily accessible to casual users.)