This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
I'm looking at the name at the top of the infobox. My assumption would have been that the name shown there would be the name by which the property is listed in the NRHP (i.e. Old Scotch Church), rather than the operational name of the property owner. . . . -Ipoellet 03:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That would be true if it was only here because of the NRHP, but it was not started as an NRHP article. That was added after the article was started and is secondary to the church's history. The title of the infobox matches the article title. But even the church is conflicted with what name to go with if you look at their website. Also, it's not that they are the property owner, that is the church name, with the Old Scotch Church being the nikename that is now far more common in use. Sort of like calling Bill Clinton Bill instead of William. Aboutmovies 16:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure I see the need for the article title and the infobox name to match, especially given that the infobox is specifically about the NRHP listing. I acknowledge the difference between the proper name and the nickname, but the church is on the NRHP under O rather than T, so I would think the infobox would reflect that. But I'm happy for the call to be yours. G'day! -Ipoellet 18:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]