Talk:Occupational burnout/Archives/2017

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mayo's Hawthorne Studies

Can someone explain what this is? It is mentioned as if the reader should know what Mayo's Hawthorne Studies are. Thank you. --Lucas (talk) 22:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

User:Lucasreddinger, the Hawthorne research was very weak. The Hawthorne research is not worth citing because it is so weak. The following two papers underline the weakness of the research.
Parsons, H. M. (1974). What happened at Hawthorne? Science, 183(4128), 922–932. doi:10.1126/science.183.4128.922
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2011). Was there really a Hawthorne effect at the Hawthorne plant? An analysis of the original illumination experiments. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3, 224–238. doi: 10.1257/app.3.1.224
The next paper indicts the ideas behind Hawthorne.
Bell, D. (1947, January). The study of man: Adjusting men to machines. Commentary, 3, 79–88. Iss246 (talk) 21:34, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

I deleted the reference to Hawthorne (the claim that employee assistance programs developed out of the Hawthorne studies) because the claim was not sourced. I am not asserting that Hawthorne and employee assistance programs are unrelated. They may very well be related (although such a connection is not mentioned in the employee assistance program Wikipedia entry). The claim however should have a source if it is to remain in the burnout entry. Iss246 (talk) 16:46, 18 April 2017 (UTC)