Talk:ON TV (TV network)/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

do list

Some things to add to the article or do further research on:

ON-TV showed the first on-air broadcast of Star Wars (as an additional paid event $6 IIRC) it was preceded by hardware wars (air date unknown). ON-TV was also used by the Academy to screen films for the Academy awards in the early 80's.

SelectTV (when it took over) replaced the ON-TV boxes with different boxes. The ON-TV boxes were simple wooden boxes with the logo on the front. There was a large two-position knob that said "ON and Off" and when "ON" illuminated an LED and de-scrambled the picture. These boxes were activated/deactivated via an over-the-air signal.

The SelecTV boxes worked in a similar fashion, except that they also had 4 spin dials that the end user used to enter the "unlock code" for that month's programming.

note: I hope this is the right place to mention this. The bit about David Cronenberg belongs in a trivia section, not under programming. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.247.64.182 (talk) 06:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Audio

I changed the term of scrambled audio to "garbled or substituted" -- the reason being is that some stations broadcast an alternate signal to non-paying customers. In Detroit, WXON's alternate audio was just silence, with an occasional "You're watching On-TV". It's competitor, WIHT and it's "IT" service, broadcasted audio from NOAA Weather Radio. -- azumanga 17:20, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ontvlogo.jpg

Image:Ontvlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

vandalism?

What in the world is this part of the "programming" section supposed to mean?

The most well know owner was termed "Bob O" as he bought his ONTV for the purpose of allowing his neighborhood to view the night porn.

In the Summer of 1981, Bob O was eating dinner when his ON went OFF. A closer inspection to the outside cable saw if neatly severed about 5 inches below the connector. However, due to his lace of urgency, the connecter was again severed about 9 inches above, leaving about a 1.25 foot gap (with the known missing element found 12 years later on a roof down the road). Again, a lack of urgency to repair this deficit basically forced a three foot section to be removed. In addition, since these issues were not bothering the Bob, the normal antenna was cut, and the ONTV cable was yanked, sending the ONTV converter box across the room and slamming into the wall. Bob O finally took action, and two days later his electric was shut off and master switch permanently sealed up. He also had his front yard turned into a fire circus, but in the only sense of urgency he ever had, he ended the performance prematurely and few were able to enjoy the effects

I think it's vandalism, but if not it's poorly written and I'm going to remove it. If it wasn't vandalism, please, rewrite it so it makes sense before putting it back!76.226.125.152 (talk) 05:17, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

I am now convinced it is vandalism, as this was also found under the "basic service fees" section.

In certain areas in Florida, if your name was Bob O, you ended up paying double, and this was mainly for the in home show of the ONTV converter box bouncing around the house, trying to fit through the hole in the wall made by the cable coming into the home. Plus the pyrotechnics charge was also added to the bill, however, the asshole actually didn't like this part. He stopped the show just as it was getting started. His neighbor was just sitting down to have an outdoor snack (provided in the form of fruit and eggs, and one Devil Dog) and enjoy the show. Bob blamed him for all the problems but then it was determined that he could not have made any phone calls as his phone was ringing off the hook from the Jerry Lewis Telethon switchboard and the Mayor of the city (wondering why he was not invited to the backyard carnival, which helped to rent porn and donate to the telethon).

Somebody just trying to habe fun I guess.76.226.125.152 (talk) 05:22, 9 May 2008 (UTC)