This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Errors[edit]

The equations as presented on this page make no sense. The Gaussian weighting function, for instance, is:

f(p,q)=e^{-{{\left\vert B(q)^{2}-B(p)^{2}\right\vert } \over h^{2}}}

but the $^{2}$ should apply to the difference, not to each term. Also, B(p) can't be the average value surrounding the pixel! In NLM, you want co compare each pixel of the patch (reference position) to each pixel of patches in the neighborhood, and use their difference as a distance between the patches. The equations presented here do not match the ones of the paper and maybe these should be use directly rather than being rewritten incorrectly. This is currently a disaster for someone trying to implement NLM out of this page :) --2001:9E8:4544:E800:5CC:4341:9E77:2B70 (talk) 20:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Combine similar nl-mean filter article[edit]

It seems that this article and Non-local means filter treats the same arguments... Should we put them together? --Llorenzi (talk) 17:24, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done --mcld (talk) 12:08, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Non-local means. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111118001653/http://www.stanford.edu:80/~slansel/tutorial/summary.htm to http://www.stanford.edu/~slansel/tutorial/summary.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]