This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Could someone add something about what NN thinks about the work she does - we need to get beyond lists of records
90.16.46.213 18:35, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I removed WP:NPOV items, and the "External links" section (see WP:EL). I also removed the reference to "Bird of Cuzco" from the opening paragraph because it's listed under "Compilations". --Horse Badorties 14:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Some of the stuff can go back on there with citations (Nastasia definitely was a favorite of Peel, but the backing might be on-air only); however I don't understand why you cut all the external links, it's far beyond WP:EL since there were official sites on there and 4 links is far from a link farm, especially in an article classed as a stub and still growing. Sighrik 15:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that if something is cited, it could be there. The problem is, none of what I removed was cited. I've heard others say that she was a favorite of Peel's, so it seems that it should be verifiable -- if there was an interview with him where he said that, for instance.
Regarding the external links, it's not that it was a "link farm", but that the links violated either WP:EL, which states in part that links to be avoided are: "to social networking sites (such as MySpace)..."; or WP:ADVERT, which states in part: "Articles considered advertisements include those that are ... designed to promote a company or individual." --Horse Badorties 02:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's "articles" meaning Wikipedia articles, not external websites. WP:ADVERT deals with adverts masquarading as Wikipedia articles, not to external link issues, which are dealt with at WP:EL. The idea that we cannot link to the subject's own website because it "promotes" that individual is ludicrous, and not what the WP:ADVERT above quote refers to.FrFintonStack (talk) 02:10, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
