This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
I'm worried we may have a WP:BLP1E here, and the event is rather negative. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:08, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Dennis Brown. Thanks for the feedback. Well, we may call it a WP:BLP1E, it is a point of view and can be different. This is not a small event and has initiated lots of issues in India, esp political system and business community. Magnitude of the problem is estimated to be in excess of $30 billion and Niira is the key to the entire thing. Without her, there would be no such controversy. Case is of importance like another WP:BLP1EMurder of Stephen Lawrence. Please consider. Thanks AKS (talk) 20:22, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Adding a list of clients is NOT appropriate here, period. Because she is living, any and all claims must be CAREFULLY SOURCED, or the claim will be deleted. Being a negative biography is treading on very thin ice for Wikipedia. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:27, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The issue is that Nira Radia is not the event. The event is the 2G spectrum scam and Radia's involvement is the Radia tapes controversy. This article was already deleted by the discussion here, and consensus was that Radia was not notable beyond this event. The article currently does not indicate her notability beyond this event. AKS, what rationale do you have for not merging this article into the Radia tapes article per WP:BLP1E? In the example you cite, there is no article for Stephen Lawrence, because his event is notable and he is not. This is the case with Radia, right? Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:10, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have redirected (again) to the Radia tapes controversy per the outcome of the AfD. Nothing new has been presented, if there's anything new then consensus needs to be gained on Talk:Radia tapes controversy before starting off with a new article. —SpacemanSpiff 05:44, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
