Talk:Nightdive Studios

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nightdive Studios article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Nightdive Studios" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Rick Jay Glen (1 participant)
Unreleased third Minecraft album (2 participants)
Kelly Metzger (4 participants)
David McGarry (3 participants)
Stumble Guys (8 participants)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (8 participants)
Carlos Pesina (3 participants)
Atlus USA (5 participants; relisted)
Danny Mastrogiorgio (2 participants; relisted)
Police Trainer (2 participants; relisted)
Sephiroth (20 participants; relisted)
The Boss (Metal Gear) (6 participants; relisted)
Balloon Brothers (4 participants; relisted)
Enigma Engine (4 participants; relisted)
ClanLib (8 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Reddit AMA as reliable, self-published primary source?[edit]

Does the Stephen Kick's AMA falls under WP:SELFPUB as WP:PRIMARY ("Press release")? About the AMA as self-published source, while WP seems not to have a specific section for Reddit, the Twitter related one seems similar enough WP:Twitter-EL:

As a reliable source: Sometimes. A specific tweet may be useful as a self-published, primary source. Twitter incorporates a Verified Account mechanism to identify accounts of celebrities and other notable people; this should be considered in judging the reliability of Twitter messages.

The AMA was verified so I think this applies here. Cheers Shaddim (talk) 14:47, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AMAs are definetly not press releases. While it does well WP:SELFPUB's 2.–5., it might fail 1.: "the material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim;", which is what should be discussed. As for now, I am ok with the source, but Wikipedia may not. Thoughts? Lordtobi (✉) 15:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree strongly on the importance of the limitations imposed by "the material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim;". I interpret this as the responsibility of the WP editors in material selection and formulation (which makes primary sources so undesirable, always near OR). In the current form of usage and formulation I believe the requirement of this clause is fulfilled: no exceptional claim, no controversial topic, no generalized interpretation, just directly backing of the fact of an "announcement", not indicating too much truth or reality. ("Kick announced....") cheers Shaddim (talk) 18:38, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]