Talk:Neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to blood.

Medicine: Hematology-oncology Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hematology-oncology task force.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

External links[edit]

External links to patient support groups (especially online chat boards), blogs, and fundraising groups are normally not accepted on Wikipedia. External links are supposed to be "encyclopedic in nature," not "helpful to patients" in nature. Patients and their families are smart enough to search search the internet if they want a support group. Please read the external links policy and the specific rules for medical articles before adding more external links. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:48, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is such a rare disorder that doctors have never seen it before and therefore makes the support group link INVALUABLE to the the people who have this condition. In this case I feel it is very important to have the support group link. Many people find the support group go on to later be diagnosed with the disorder from being informed. It saves lives of the children affected. So please leave the support link up there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ourmiraclechris (talk • contribs) 15:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you could class the link as "encyclopedic in nature". As explained by the Oxford dictionary/Thesaurus:- encylopedic Coprehensive, Complete, wide-ranging, all-inclusive, all-embracing, all-encompassing, thorough, compendious, Vast. A fantastic site which embraces all of these factors. A Vast amount of important and wide-ranging information that i couldnt have been without. This group has helped me understand the condition NAIT and what medical procedures were needed to ensure the healthy delivery of my 3 children. A great resource needed by all NAIT sufferers, So could you please leave the support link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.36.69 (talk) 10:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the comment that 15% of cases are due to anti-HPA 5a is incorrect: it should be 5b (see for example Postgraduate Haematology, Hoffbrand AV, Chapter 15. 195.99.217.140 (talk) 12:03, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

This just in doi:10.1111/bjh.12235 JFW | T@lk 21:25, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SMALL CAPS[edit]

Noticing that user Enedrox changed the acronyms to use small caps (sc2 template) in a couple of articles. Seems a violation of MOS. What was the reason for this? -- MC — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.131.2.3 (talk) 22:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]