Talk:Nellis Solar Power Plant

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Opening heading[edit]

This article needs to be re-written, it is almost word for word a cut and paste from the reference. 199.125.109.43 (talk) 06:20, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another photo that can be uploaded.[1] The caption says: (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Nadine Y. Barclay) 199.125.109.43 (talk) 07:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article mentions a 20% capacity factor. First of all, the definition of capacity factor is wrong. secondly, there is not enough data in the article to calculate that, unlike what the text makes it sound like. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.174.37.50 (talk) 20:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unanswered question?[edit]

Reading through the article, there seems to be some inconsistency in the financials. If the airforce saves 1 milion $/year with 6.8 cents /kwh savings, and the farm cost 100 million $ to build, how the heck is MMA Renewable Ventures ever going to make any money? They are IOW getting about 200-300 thousand $/year for the electricity the sell. --NeilenMarais (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you read between the lines they sold the renewable credits to Nevada Power for about $100 million - the cost of installation. The piddling 2.2 cents/kWh just pays their profit on the project (all of this is total guesswork). One report said that the Air Force was going to save $1 million in 2007 ("this year"), yet it went fully online only on December 17. By my calculation the Air Force will actually save (0.09-0.022) x 25 million kWh = $1.7 million each year, except that of course that $100 million came from Nevada Power, which will inevitably contribute to raising Nevada Power's rates from 9 cents to 10 cents/kWh or more, and since the Air Force only gets 30% of their electricity from the panels, they eventually lose more than they save as the cost of electricity goes up (the 30% from the sun is at a fixed price, the remaining 70% is not at a fixed price). No one knows what the eventual price of electricity will be. Without renewables it would skyrocket. With renewables it could actually decrease eventually. 199.125.109.43 (talk) 19:41, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fallout: New Vegas depiction[edit]

Would it be appropriate to mention in the article that the solar array was recently depicted as a playable area in the video game Fallout: New Vegas?

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nellis Solar Power Plant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nellis Solar Power Plant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]