Talk:Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 11

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 30 January 2018 by reviewer Bkissin (talk · contribs).

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

COI tag[edit]

This article was done in response to a Special request posted on my talk page. The battalion had attempted to do it's own article and was rejected for COI. My input was requested as the battalion thought there were no COI issues with me doing it as I had no affiliation or history with the unit. However, 2601:188:180:11f0:65f5:930c:b0b2:cd63 seems to feel there was or is a COI for me as well and the Wikipedia Military History group instructed me to find out what the exact issues are. Mcb133aco (talk) 01:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see that the COI tag is necessary, the edits by NMCB11PAO have not been a major contribution to the article and in some instances they have been reverted. My recommendation is that the tag be removed and that NMCB11PAO refrain from further edits. Pennsy22 (talk) 16:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll remove the COI tag, but there are multiple issues with the article (mention of non notables in captions and article body, unsourced content), which could merit various templates, or, preferably, clean up. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:53, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, notwithstanding suggested copy edits Mcb133aco has done admirable work on this article. What initially drew my attention was some unsourced editorializing in the lede. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:59, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]