Talk:National Convention/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Royroydeb (talk · contribs) 00:32, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why was aristocrats and antirepublicans absent?
Majorities begin revolutions; minorities carry them on- whats this sentence doing?
The rest part of the section has no citation
from all classes of society - but there was the society of estates
«The abolition of the royalty... How is it directly related to the text?
There is no link of Girondin Convention in its section
Jacobin club was an important part of the French Revolution and you have just written "name of a club."
Again a similar statement by Robespiere comes
Who were the Girondins is not clear
Put reference in the short two line paragraphs in The Trial of the King
The crisis and fall of the Gironde - Put reference in the necessary part

RRD13 (talk) 11:19, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's been two months nearly and nothing's been updated; as such this fails GA status. Wizardman 16:51, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]