Talk:Nasdaq Composite

Business High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Improvement needed[edit]

This page is just a mishmash of bullet notes. I don't know how to tag things and can't really edit anything, but this should be rectified to improve the quality to match those of Wikipedia. --72.69.211.179 (talk)Poxywallow —Preceding undated comment added 23:19, 3 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]

I added a cleanup template. WikiWinters (talk) 20:45, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

can somone please explain how the nasdaq is calculated[edit]

with some specificity? the stock market index article does not say how the major indexes are weighted or calculated. skak E L 15:13, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Im interested in this topic of nasdaq composite weighting id like someone to come along and teach us eventually. theres over 3,000 companies though so some individual companies would weight as little as half a percent or something like that. i would like to know this weighting scheme for scolarly reasons like you.76.244.154.251 (talk) 23:49, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Five years after this request was posted, we still don't have a basic explanation in this article of how it is calculated. Is it based on market capitalization like the S&P500, share price like the Dow Jones, or what? Pretty basic issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.225.200.92 (talk) 08:55, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Still no word on how this is calculated?! WHY? as of 12/16/2019 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2610:130:103:200:CC28:7780:D514:D2A3 (talk) 16:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nasdaq Composite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131105122607/http://business-finance.top10-digest.com/stocks-rally-to-pre-crisis-heights/ to http://business-finance.top10-digest.com/stocks-rally-to-pre-crisis-heights/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 June 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved Mahveotm (talk) 09:04, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nasdaq Composite → NASDAQ Composite – It seems that someone got the spelling wrong so this is just to get the correct format which has the name in all capital letters. AquilaXIII (talk) 02:15, 14 June 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. bd2412 T 21:51, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The naming of these article is an utter mess. NASDAQ was moved to Nasdaq two weeks ago on the grounds that it wasn't an acronym, but the article says it is an acronym, so for the time being I have reverted that move. Nasdaq, Inc. (not a normal naming pattern under WP:NCCORP) used to be at NASDAQ OMX Group but was moved in 2015; now NASDAQ OMX Group instead redirects to Nasdaq Nordic. Meanwhile we have NASDAQ OMX Commodities Europe, NASDAQ Dubai, NASDAQ-100, NASDAQ MarketSite, etc. but Closing milestones of the Nasdaq Composite and List of largest daily changes in the Nasdaq Composite. It doesn't make sense to move this article without also moving at least the other two "composite" articles. We also have articles like List of Israeli companies quoted on the Nasdaq, not to mention things like Philadelphia Stock Exchange that starts "Philadelphia Stock Exchange (PHLX), now known as NASDAQ OMX PHLX..." and cf. also JASDAQ Securities Exchange.

This clearly needs some sort of centralized discussion to get all of these articles on the same page, or at least to get to consistency among the articles referring to exchanges and consistency among the articles referring to the company. Dekimasuよ! 19:13, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 3 February 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 13:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NASDAQ Composite → Nasdaq Composite – Reverse the move of two and a half years ago, as even then the all-caps spelling is outdated and incorrect. Although originally an acronym, it is no longer treated as such. Note that Nasdaq was just moved for the same reason, and this would bring this article in line with that one and other Nasdaq, Inc. properties, none of which use the all-caps spelling any longer. oknazevad (talk) 09:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy move. Obviously the Nasdaq move was intended to include this as well. O.N.R. ^(talk) 10:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:48, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rreagan007 (talk) 18:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 00:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.