Talk:NPower (USA)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Education

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Spam[edit]

There is quite a lot of straight up spam here. I am going to rip out the sections that are mostly spam. If this wasn't a charity it would be tagged for deletion already. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Given the poor literacy of much of what I have removed I feel I have actually done them a big favour. I'm not sure if the COI editors will agree but lets not worry about that.

What we do need to worry about is that this is still a pretty dreadful article with fully zero (Yes. I counted them twice just to be sure) WP:RS valid references. The history section is still way too verbose and full of confusing jargon that makes the actual meaning less clear than it should be. --DanielRigal (talk) 21:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TSC[edit]

This acronym is used several times, but I don't have the slightest clue what it means as it isn't defined in the article.HRouillier (talk) 22:53, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On the same note, what's NPO?HRouillier (talk) 22:55, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The rather rambling History section says that TSC is "Technology Service Corps" although it doesn't explain what that means very well. I'm guessing that NPO is "Non-Profit Organisation" but I'm not 100% sure. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:19, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

article in need of improvement[edit]

I was "attracted" to this article when I noticed the word esteemed being used for self-glorification. Then I clicked on each of the references, and was annoyed by them just taking me to pages on their website.

I considered doing an AfD proposal, but I have somewhat of a philosophical objection, but I'm more of an inclusionist. I also thought about stubifying as an option. (I looked back at the history, I think some of the older revs really were less offensive, even with more details about their history.)

What I'd really like to see is for this non-profit organization to figure out how to manage it's own Wikipedia article ... I know it's a lot to ask, but why should we be wasting precious Wikipedia editor time on this this sort of organization ought to be able to do it themselves, COI notwithstanding? Suggestions? Fabrickator (talk) 04:09, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]