Talk:Mother to Son

A fact from Mother to Son appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 March 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Langston Hughes's poems "Mother to Son", "Harlem", and "The Negro Speaks of Rivers" have been described as "anthems of black America"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mother to Son.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 19:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

( Comment or view )

( Article history links:

)

... that Langston Hughes's poems Mother to Son, Harlem, and The Negro Speaks of Rivers have been described as "anthems of black America"? Source: " “The Negro Speaks of Rivers,” “Mother to Son,” and “Harlem” are anthems of black America." Hughes, (James Mercer) Langston 2/1/1902--5/22/1967. (2018). In S. D. Hatch (Ed.), Encyclopedia of African-American writing: five centuries of contribution : trials & triumphs of writers, poets, publications and organizations (3rd ed.). Grey House Publishing.

Reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Distichia muscoides, Template:Did you know nominations/Ronald Graham, Template:Did you know nominations/Romano Floriani Mussolini
Comment: Have three QPQs done, will list them shortly when I dig them up. "Negro Speaks of Rivers" is 5x expanded, others created. Could split to three individual noms if this is not interesting.

Created by Eddie891 (talk). Self-nominated at 01:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Eddie891, review follows:

The Negro Speaks of Rivers

5x expansion from 12 February; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; one minor comment, there's something weird with the formatting of the Miller citation: it's formatted as a web-cite (with "accessed on") but appears to be an offline source, from the date this precedes your work on the article; I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing from the accessible sources;

Harlem (poem)

New article created 10 February; well written and cited inline to reliable sources; spotcheck found no issues with overly close paraphrasing, quotations are appropriately attributed

Mother to Son

New article created 9 February; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; I found no issues with overly close paraphrasing in a random spotcheck on sources and quotations are appropriately attributed

Hook

Is interesting enough for me, mentioned in all three articles; though if we are putting it in quotation marks on the main page it should be in quotation marks in the article; AGF on offline source (which looks reliable); three QPQs carried out

Looking good, just the quotation mark thing to clear up - Dumelow (talk) 08:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Dumelow, I've just removed that cite in "The Negro Speaks of Rivers", as I can verify it with the other one and I don't understand the formatting either. I've expanded the relevant sentence in each article so that it includes the quote. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 16:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]