Talk:Morley Baer

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Morley Baer article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 9 May 2011 by reviewer Joey Roe (talk · contribs).

Thank you for the comments on the article on Morley Baer. They are: 1. This article may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may interest only a particular audience. (August 2018) 2. This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information.(August 2018) 3. This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. (August 2018)

Response: 1. True, but its readers will likely be art photographers or artists for whom some detail is necessary. I tried to balance detail with cogent commentary. 2. Baer was an accomplished photographer, writer, and teacher. It was impossible to adequately write about him and his accomplishments without being subjective. However, one standard for such subjectiveness would be the text in Baer (2008}. I believe that my article falls far short of that - both in eloquence and subjectiveness. 3. That's possible. It's difficult to strike a balance between Wikipedia's requirement that the subject be person of note, while still written from a Neutral point of view. I tried to quote enough information to establish that Baer is indeed a person of note per Notability (people) while maintaining as much of an encyclopedic tone Writing better articles as I could for the cohesiveness of the article.

I'd be happy to receive your commentary on this submission.

Thank you

Garrapata (talk) 23:47, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In a more recent visit to the Morley Baer article, I tightened the text here and there, corrected a few spellings, made better use of references to remove any subjectivity I could find, and inserted a new reference, all to improve its encyclopedic value.

(talk) Garrapata (talk) 23:50, 11 December 2018 (UTC))[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

MB by Getta,'95.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:07, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Racconish of 1-22-2019: I received this message from Racconish:  the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Baer, By Brigette.jpg

Please note that I uploaded the image for publication by Wikipedia per terms of the license, CC BY-SA 4.0.

My understanding is that this allows the image to be used per the terms of that license and that it fully meets Wikipedia's definition of 'free' publication. If you agree, please restore the deleted image. If you don't agree, kindly give reasons why CC BY-SA 4.0. is inadequate

Thank you Garrapata — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garrapata (talk • contribs) 00:26, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Garrapata: Regarding the above deletion notice: Please respond at the relevant discussion on Commons: Commons:Deletion requests/File:MB by Getta,'95.jpg. Also, please always sign your posts on Talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~), to add a timestamp. --Animalparty! (talk) 06:16, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]