This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Okay, all articles in the manhwa section just got new infoboxes, and I've gone through all of them, en masse, doing some cleanup. So, I apologize for screwing up a few wikilinks along the way, after having to correct them on almost every single article (almost every author and illustrator name was messed up), and I appreciate you straightening them out. Like I said, after checking multiple links on dozens and dozens of pages, my brain got a bit mushy. However, I don't see any reason for refusing to allow redlinks for companies just because you personally think no one's going to make an article. I'm logging a list of all these manhwa distributors around the world as I keep encountering them, and when their articles are created, we'll all wish the redlinks were there. It also helps prioritize article creation by using the "what links here" feature. So unless you know for sure those articles will never be created, please don't remove redlinks that others insert... I don't know about others, but I insert them for a reason. :) --hamu♥hamu (TALK) 04:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, fine. But you should use "(magazine)" and not "(anthology)" for the Party disambiguation since we're talking about a magazine here.--十八 04:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm I've run onto two manhwa mag articles, and one had the title "Wink magazine" and the other was "Booking (anthology)" and since I had to move/rename Wink anyway b/c of the capitalization, I went with "(anthology)." It's kind of six of one, half-dozen of the other, isn't it? That was my thinking. Anthology is the terminology used in the comics project, of which manhwa are a part. Do you think it's vital? I can't rename the articles and welcome your opinion. I'm doing this pretty singlehandedly, with content that's been mostly created willy-nilly and then abandoned. If you're interested in this subject area, you might want to visit the WP:COMICS Wikiproject Comics World Comics group. :) --hamu♥hamu (TALK) 04:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}