Talk:Montana Highway 287
Montana Highway 287 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 8, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Montana Highway 287/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Floydian (talk · contribs) 20:45, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
- Lede
- Canada is very big. Which highway, province or city did it connect to?
- "The highway was rerouted to assume MT 34 in the early 1960s and was removed from the cross-state corridor, along which it was mostly replaced by US 287, in the mid-1960s." - this sentence is rather confusing.
- Route description
- An official map can't reference the descriptions of the surroundings. Add Google maps as a reference, and possibly something else for the tailings piles (no doubt there is some local news article describing them and the history behind them). Ref [6] seems like a candidate.
- I feel too many sentences begin with "MT 287". YMMV.
- It may make sense to simply list the towns where it is known as Main Street rather than repeating that info at each applicable town along the route. Again, YMMV; both this and the above are up to you.
- DO you figure all of those redlinks are potential articles? The church and the houses seem iffy... but I'm not in on the local history at all.
- The redlinks are either tourist attractions, National Register of Historic Places, or secondary state highways. The first two are of classes notable enough to have their own articles, and the latter may be part of a list article someday. VC 04:48, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- Other
Any images that you can add of this highway? Can you provide a map perhaps?
- I do not have any images. Images are not a requirement at the GA level. VC 04:48, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
-- Overall, the history is very well referenced (though I say this having not completed a check of the refs themselves), and I have very few complaints. - Floydian τ ¢ 21:42, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
- I appreciate your review, Floydian! Good to hear from you again. I addressed all but one of your points. I will address the last in the next few days. VC 04:48, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Pass the article meets the GA criteria as far as I'm concerned. I do recommend adding the province to the lede and using Google maps as a second source alongside the state road map, but I won't let either hold up the promotion. Great work! - Floydian τ ¢ 08:05, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- GA-Class U.S. state highway articles
- Mid-importance U.S. state highway articles
- GA-Class Road transport articles
- Mid-importance Road transport articles
- U.S. state highway articles
- GA-Class Montana road transport articles
- Mid-importance Montana road transport articles
- Montana road transport articles
- U.S. Roads portal selected articles
- GA-Class U.S. road transport articles
- Mid-importance U.S. road transport articles
- U.S. road transport articles