This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project in 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article was created or improved during the Wildcard Edition GA edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Green project in October 2022. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in GreenWikipedia:WikiProject Women in GreenTemplate:WikiProject Women in GreenWomen in Green articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Flibirigit (talk) 01:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
5x expanded by JuanGLP (talk). Self-nominated at 17:04, 6 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]
@JuanGLP: Im very sorry but i'm going to have to fail this nomination. This is because the article fails the newness category. Though the article was indeed created and expanded 5x by you. It MUST be done and nominated within 7 days. Sadly, this isn't the case. I do see that you've nominated this to good article status. If this article does become a good article than you can renominate this during the 7-day period after it's promotion. Until then though, this nomination has failed. Good article though. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:16, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Closing nomination as ineligible at this time. No prejudice against the nomination being reopened if/when the article achieves GA status. Flibirigit (talk) 01:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I'm going to have to fail this nomination based on prose and sourcing. There is some unsourced content as well as some unreliable sources used in the article to support information. I spotted some prose issues as well, which include repetition and unnecessary information. You did a good job improving this article nonetheless so don't feel discouraged. Sebbirrrr (talk) 18:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
@JuanGLP: Im very sorry but i'm going to have to fail this nomination. This is because the article fails the newness category. Though the article was indeed created and expanded 5x by you. It MUST be done and nominated within 7 days. Sadly, this isn't the case. I do see that you've nominated this to good article status. If this article does become a good article than you can renominate this during the 7-day period after it's promotion. Until then though, this nomination has failed. Good article though. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:16, 18 October 2022 (UTC)