Talk:Mobile billboard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:The SkyBoard.JPG Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:The SkyBoard.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:07, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Driven media[edit]

The article Driven media is an inactive stub, whose content is largely a copy of content from the Mobile billboard article here. What little unique content it has can easily fit in here. Reify-tech (talk) 15:19, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional tone and NPOV issues[edit]

The article was flagged as being written in a promotional tone and having neutral point of view issues. The article as a whole is glowingly positive about vehicles that drive around cities carrying advertisements. It contains nothing about how the vehicles add to traffic, pollution and can potentially distract drivers and pedestrians. There is a completely unsourced paragraph about the effectiveness of the ads that contains numbers in the 90%-110% range, suggesting that nearly everyone who sees one of these vehicles remembers the content. The "Legality" section does not mention any areas where the vehicles are prohibited, and argues, without sources, that moving vehicles with ads on them are a constitutionally protected First Amendment right. If advertising is really a First Amendment right, why aren't there moving vehicles with tobacco ads on them? Roches (talk) 17:27, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]